My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/06/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
06/06/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:15:12 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:52:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/06/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS: <br />On March 3, 1989, County staff observed that parcel numbers <br />24-33-39-00011-0003-00001.0 and 00003.0 had been cleared, prior to <br />the issuance of County landclearing or tree removal permits. The <br />area cleared is approximately 0.25 acres in size. The property, <br />lots 1 and 3 of Oslo Park, Block C, is located at the northeast <br />corner of Oslo Road and llth Court S.W. The property 'is zoned IL, <br />Light Industrial District. <br />Inspection of debris on-site indicated that approximately 7 to 10 <br />protec'ked pines over 8" diameter had been removed. After review- <br />ing aerials of the property, it is estimated that at least 4 of <br />the pines werelocated in required yard setbacks and not within <br />the net buildable area of_the site. <br />On April 6, 1989, staff met with Mr. Cosgrove, the owner, and Mr. <br />Duncan Thomas of D & L Backhoe Services to discuss the violation. <br />Mr. Cosgrove explained that he was not aware of the need for <br />permits, and would not knowingly violate county ordinances. Mr. <br />Thomas also indicated he was unware of the need for County per- <br />mits. <br />ALTERNATIVE & ANALYSIS: <br />Section 231-6(a) & (b) , Tree Protection, of the Code of Laws and <br />Ordinances of Indian River County prohibits the performance of any <br />tree removal, landclearing or grubbing unless tree removal and <br />landclearing permits have first been issued by the County, unless <br />expressly exempted within the ordinance. The ordinance further <br />specifies that a violation shall be punishable upon conviction by <br />a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500)• per tree and <br />landclearing activity or by imprisonment in the County jail for up <br />to sixty (60) days, or both. <br />Section 231-16 of the Tree Protection Ordinance provides that <br />permits may be obtained after -the -fact upon determination by the <br />environmental planner that activities were performed in accordance <br />with permit issuance criteria. <br />Based on the illegal landclearing and number of protected trees <br />that could have been saved (ie - 4+ pines), staff requested on May <br />5, 1989, that Mr. Cosgrove and D & L Backhoe submit a .voluntary <br />payment of $2,500.00. Voluntary payment as requested by staff has <br />not been submitted; attorneys for the respondents have requested a <br />hearing before the County Commission to consider the matter. <br />.STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners consider <br />obtaining a voluntary payment of $2,500 dollars, and require an <br />after -the -fact permit. In the event that any said agreement is <br />not forth -coming, staff recommends the Board of County Commission- <br />ers grant staff the authorization to pursue available remedies in <br />County Court. <br />Roland DeBlois, Chief of Environmental Planning, advised <br />that staff's recommendation is to assess the $2,500 as a <br />voluntary payment and require an after -the -fact permit, and if <br />that is not forthcoming, that the Board authorize staff to pursue <br />this matter in County Court. Both the landclearer and the <br />property owner were unwilling to pay the $2,500 fine and <br />requested that this matter come before the Board today. <br />Commissioner Eggert inquired about our past experience with <br />this landclearer, and Mr. DeBlois reported that the County has no <br />record of previous violations with this licensed landclearer. <br />However, our records show that he did not attend the 1985 <br />workshop on the tree protection ordinance. <br />JUN 61989 <br />37 <br />floor 76 ,,,,9s3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.