My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/06/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
06/06/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:15:12 AM
Creation date
6/12/2015 2:52:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUS 6 1989 <br />BOOK .76 F;",,GE 954. <br />H. Underwriter for North County Sewer Assessment <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 5/10/89: <br />TO: Members of the Board <br />of County Commissioners <br />DATE: May 10, 1989 <br />SUBJECT: UNDERWRITER FOR NORTH COUNTY <br />SEWER ASSESSMENT <br />CONSENT AGENDA <br />FROM: Joseph A. Baird <br />OMB Director <br />In recent weeks the county has worked with Mr. Art Ziev of Gulfstream <br />Financial on the $6.5 million dollar Farmers Home Administration <br />Refinancing Bond Issue. The work involved could not have been done <br />without the assistance of a competent underwriter. <br />The County can choose an underwriter through formal means (by <br />advertising through Requests for Proposals) or the option of merely <br />selecting an individual or company that has already given good <br />service. Staff feels that Art Ziev's prior work record with us, his <br />extensive knowledge of the county utilities financing, plus our time <br />constraints, make him a suitable candidate for the complexities of <br />the North County Sewer Assessment bond issue. <br />Staff would like permission to utilize Art Ziev of Gulfstream <br />Financial as Underwriter on the North County Sewer Assessment with <br />the underwriters spread not to exceed 2.25%. <br />Commissioner Eggert asked why we are not going out to bid on <br />this, and Commissioner Scurlock explained that in most cases we <br />are going out to bid. The library issue, of course, is one that <br />will be a bid item. There are two different approaches that you <br />can take on these various issues. If it is a general obligation <br />or a very uncomplicated issue, like the library, the Finance <br />Advisory Committee and staff usually recommends to go ahead and <br />do it competitively. When it is a negotiated deal, such as a <br />special assessment bond which is somewhat unique, he felt it <br />suits well to work with a team of people who, in fact, can bring <br />some expertise and longevity to the program. In this case, Art <br />Ziev has been working on this particular issue, as well as <br />another special assessment, for a period of time, and <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.