Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 77 r,,,UF 46 <br />If a referendum is considered, the earliest one could be scheduled is 90 days <br />.from the date of approval by the Commission. Taking into account the time <br />required to adopt an ordinance and a purchase contract this month, the <br />earliest date would be October. The estimated cost is $27,000. As proposed, <br />the. question would provide for a one year millage levy to fund the <br />acquisition: Considering Mr. Ewing's requirement of total payment by <br />December and the time frame for placing the millage rate on the tax roll, if <br />approved, a short term note would be required. The total estimated expense <br />for acquisition, including interest and issuance cost, would be approximately <br />$2.9 million. The equivalent millage rate, based on the current roll, would <br />be .7929. <br />If the acquisition is approved, . a determination would need to be made <br />concerning operation of the facility. Obvious factors would be scope, cost, <br />funding, and by whom. Initially, the Preservation Society proposed that <br />$500,000 be included in the referendum question for operating and <br />maintenance purposes. As proposed, the funds would be used to establish a <br />trust fund. The interest from the fund (approximately $50,000 annually) <br />coupled with revenues generated by the Society would be utilized by the <br />Society to operate the facility. However, as indicated by the County <br />Attorney (Attachment W. this alternative is not feasible under Florida law. <br />Estimates have been prepared for operation and maintenance by either the <br />County ( Attachment #4) or the Society ( Attachment #5) . Both are preliminary <br />and require further discussion and refinement. However, I believe they are <br />realistic enough to serve as a guide to determine direction. <br />The estimates for operation by the County, assumes that initially the 19 acre <br />McKee site would be a passive park and there would be no utilization of the <br />wetland areas. Approximately, $99,000 would be necessary for site <br />preparation and "start up cost". In either, the first or second year, <br />construction of parking facilities would be required at an estimated expense of <br />$100,000. Additionally, at some point provision for restrooms ($30,000) <br />should be considered. Operating and maintenance expense by Public Works is <br />projected at about $70,000. As indicated, the preceding are preliminary <br />estimates' only at this time. <br />As reflected, beginning on page 36 of the Society proposal, start up and <br />capital expense are estimated at $45,700 in the first year and $47,200 the <br />second. Utilization of volunteers and donation of materials at varying stages <br />are anticipated which reduced the expense. Operating costs are projected at <br />$48,905 the first year and $73,980 the second. No provision for parking has <br />been included at- this point.. Although. the estimates are preliminary they <br />appear to reasonable, if the volunteers and donated materials are provided as <br />anticipated. <br />First year revenues are projected at $559,650. The majority, $462,500, is <br />from individual membership enrollment. Another $65,000 is from group <br />memberships. These memberships are proposed to be renewed annually and <br />therefore a continuing revenue _ source. As 1 related to the Society, the <br />estimates appear to me to be overly optimistic and even if achieved in the <br />.first year difficult to sustain in subsequent years. However, having been in <br />the community only five months it is difficult for me to adequately weigh that <br />potential. If they can achieve and sustain 20% of their goal, together with a <br />continuing volunteer effort, the plan appears feasible. Additionally, if a <br />greater amount is generated, reserve could be established for future years. <br />Taking into consideration the preceding factors from critical time element, <br />with attendant restrictions, to funding alternatives, it is my recommendation <br />that we proceed with consideration of acquisition through the referendum <br />- process. With respect to operation and maintenance, I believe some further <br />refinement is necessary prior to making a final decision. <br />46 <br />