Laserfiche WebLink
6. that the applicant have in place historic information and <br />original alignment markers and that the applicant grant to <br />the Town and County an easement enveloping the original <br />roadway alignment location such that the building of struc- <br />tures within the easement is prohibited and the prohibition <br />is enforceable. The applicant shall also mark and maintain <br />public visual access of the original alignment from the new <br />alignment and provide historical information regarding the <br />Trail prior to final effect of the abandonment.. <br />Condition #6 has been modified and toughened up a bit in <br />that staff is asking that the original alignment be marked and <br />that it be a structure free zone. <br />IT. Prior to final effect of the abandonment, the applicant shall <br />obtain from the County Public Works department a right-of-way <br />permit detailing construction of all traffic, road and <br />drainage aspects of the new roadway, construct the requested <br />improvements, and obtain acceptance and approval of the new <br />construction by the Public Works director. The constructed <br />roadway shall accommodate grove service traffic at least as <br />well as the existing alignment without adversely impacting <br />tree preservation. <br />Condition #7 has been modified the most to deal with the <br />accommodation of grove traffic. We do not want grove tractors <br />going out on A -1-A. Planner Boling continued that the applicant <br />believed he could get letters of no objection from all the grove <br />owners north of 510, but that apparently has not been the case. <br />We want the developer to demonstrate that the new alignment would <br />be at least as good, if not better for grove traffic, and staff <br />would like to add to Condition #7 the provision set out in the <br />Public Works Director's memo of June 26th which is that "Where <br />minimum 120' radii and other horizontal curves are proposed, the <br />roadway should be widened to 20' minimum. The typical cross <br />section shows only an 18' roadway width." Planner Boling advised <br />that instead of staff going with letters of no objection, they <br />have gone with having the applicant demonstrate to the Public <br />Works Director that the roadway will work. <br />Attorney Collins added that the Jungle Trail Management Plan <br />sets out criteria for realignment, but the Florida Statutes make <br />provisions for abandonment of roads. Mr. Boling tells him this <br />has been advertised for a public hearing for abandonment of that <br />portion of the road which is to be realigned, and he wanted it <br />clear for the record that there will be a public hearing on that. <br />47 <br />JUN � ' S Door l Farr <br />