My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/8/1989 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
8/8/1989 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:01:03 PM
Creation date
6/15/2015 4:50:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L:7 <br />Commissioner Bird asked if the consensus is to do something <br />with the peninsula that would be left at the present bridge <br />entrance to make it into a nice shopping area, and it was <br />confirmed that is the general idea. The dream is to have a <br />covered fishing pier on the east, and also possibly have a pier <br />on the west side and work in conjunction with private enterprise <br />to lease it out as a waterfront restaurant, boutiques, etc. On <br />the peninsula area to the east, the center road between the <br />existing stores could be turned into landscaped parking with a <br />loop access road. <br />Recreation Agreement <br />City Manager Little noted that in view of the $450,000 to <br />purchase the "Y" and more to remodel; Charles Park; Young Park; <br />$100,000 on River House for remodeling - they have a very big <br />ticket. The General Fund cannot continue to pick up that fund, <br />and he felt the time has come where we have to give serious <br />consideration to some kind of joint recreation. The City is <br />grateful for the County's significant increase in contribution, <br />but it is still a drop in the bucket. He realized the County is <br />spending money in the Oslo Road area and on the beaches which <br />will take off some impact, but he really thought we need to talk <br />about joint operation. We did this with Building and Zoning, and <br />it has worked. We did it with the Fire District, and as far as <br />the City is concerned, it worked well. He believed what the <br />County is going through now with ALS, etc., was bound to happen <br />and was long overdue. Mr. Little stressed that we need to sit <br />down and remove the roadblocks in the old agreement, if there are <br />any, so what needs to happen can happen. <br />Mr. Little noted that the City had handled recreation for a <br />very long time, and they were reluctant to give this up because <br />frankly, they did not think the County knew what they were doing. <br />They also weren't sure the custodial care would be what the City <br />has done. <br />AUG ) 198. <br />9 <br />V1.- -, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.