8/15/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

from some of the properties facing on South U.S.I and didn't give them credit against impact fees. Discussion ensued about K -Mart and Luria's, which are adjoining facilities and have made provisions to have an inner traffic flow. Public Works Director Davis explained that marginal access is provided for in the Fla. Statutes and in the DOT Manual, and what it does is protect the integrity of the arterial roadway from side friction. It is a benefit to all the abutting property owners that are connected to the marginal accesses. It is a shared benefit, and he believed there is no question that Mr. Hedin's business would benefit from this. Commissioner Eggert asked if you can go a whole block and not give access to U.S.I, and Director Davis advised that ideally you would like to have marginal access roads with only two points of ingress and egress. Attorney O'Haire claimed that this is inverse condemnation and noted that his firm has made a lot of money on that kind of proceedings. Attorney Vitunac pointed out that the County could adopt a road program to buy some land from Mr. O'Haire's clients and some others, put in a road, and assess the cost back to the people benefited, which would be his client to some degree and the lots to the south in a greater degree. The general public wouldn't pay a cent for it, and you would have a public marginal access road paid for by the people who benefited. This comes out to the same thing that the county is doing there right now, and possibly we should do that. Attorney O'Haire pointed out that machinery is not in place today, and his client has a right to say don't take my land without compensation. Director Davis continued to contend that this is more of a site related improvement. It is not something the general public would be using other than for access to Mr. Hedin's property and 25 " AUG 16 1c► �� F t'