My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/12/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
9/12/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:01:03 PM
Creation date
6/15/2015 4:57:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/12/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Boor <br />OMB Director Joe Baird recommended that everything be <br />approved except Item #2 which he would like to bring back next <br />week. In discussing this with Public Works Director Jim Davis, <br />there are several alternatives we could use in funding the paving <br />of 87th Street running through Vero Lake Estates. We are looking <br />at the long term, and it' might be better to fund it out of another <br />area besides the Secondary Road Trust Fund. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt there would have to be a policy <br />decision at some point on how much is going to come from the Vero <br />Lake Estates M.S.T.U. versus some other source of revenue. <br />Director Baird explained that in this particular case, 87th <br />is the main thoroughfare through Vero Lake Estates and recalled <br />that a couple of years ago the Board dir_:ected Director Davis to <br />get that street engineered and paved. The property owners will be <br />assessed for part of it and we are looking at several other <br />sources to pay the rest of it, i.e., gas tax money, general fund <br />money, Vero Lake Estates M.S.T.U., impact fee money. <br />Commissioner Scurlock cautioned Administrator Chandler to be <br />very careful on this particular item, because in doing this we <br />could be setting some precedents in terms of how we fund these <br />various projects, specifically in relationship to Sebastian where <br />they seem to have some difficulty in understanding our impact fees <br />and what those funds can be used for. He would not like to see us <br />develop a policy we could not live with throughout the county. <br />Administrator Chandler appreciated that, and advised that he <br />would be meeting with Sebastian shortly and would be bringi.ng it: <br />back to the Board in a couple of weeks. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Eggert, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously <br />approved Budget Amendment 098, with the deletion of <br />Item #2, as recommended by OMB Director Baird. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.