Laserfiche WebLink
J. Deficit - Fleet Management <br />The Board reviewed memo from OMB Director Baird: <br />TO: Members of the Board <br />of County Commissioners <br />DATE: September 13, 1989 <br />SUBJECT: DEFICIT - <br />FLEET 10-M GEMENT <br />CONSENT AGENDA <br />FROM: Joseph A. Bairdf_ <br />OMB Director <br />'DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />The Fleet Management Department fund is accumulating a deficit which <br />we estimate to exceed $80,000. This makes the Fleet Management fund <br />overbudget. Money must be transferred to balance the fund for year <br />end or we have the potential of receiving an audit comment. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />1. Transfer money from Road and Bridge and M.S.T.U. to <br />cover the short -fall and do appropriate Budget <br />Amendment. <br />2. Bill all department's for the short -fall prorata and <br />do appropriate Budget Amendment. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve one of the <br />above alternatives and authorize the transfer of funds and Budget <br />-Amendment. <br />Chairman Wheeler stated that he would like to recommend <br />Alternative 1. <br />Commissioner Scurlock favored Alternative 2 as he felt all <br />departments should be billed for the pro rata shortfall. <br />OMB Director Baird commented that if we do that, the <br />majority of the work will be paid from Road & Bridge because they <br />are the biggest user of Fleet Management. <br />Commissioner Scurlock noted that Fleet Management would <br />cover all your fund activities - there are General Fund <br />activities that receive -service from it as well as the MSTU, and <br />he did not feel Alternative 1 provides proper cost accounting. <br />SEP 1 15 qac t F�.sc1 <br />