My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/10/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
10/10/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:23:40 AM
Creation date
6/16/2015 8:06:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/10/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Eggert believed when Mr. Jackson filled out the <br />application, he didn't note there was a mobile home on the <br />property. Staff apparently found that out later, and that would <br />make a difference in whether or not he paid the impact fee. <br />Community Development Director Keating noted that we have a <br />very complicated single family building permit process because of <br />all the things we have to look at and all the different <br />departments and agencies that are involved, i.e., Environmental <br />Health, Utilities, Engineering which has to look at the R/W, <br />driveway permits, drainage, etc. We have tried to put everything <br />on the application form to notify people all that has to be <br />looked at and about the impact fees, R/W considerations, etc. <br />On lots over 1 acre, for instance, you need a permit to remove <br />trees or do any land clearing. If someone goes ahead and removes <br />the mobile home before hand, that is at their own risk. <br />Commissioner Bowman believed the application process actu- <br />ally only took about 3 weeks, which she felt is pretty good. <br />Discussion returned to the fact that Mr. Jackson is <br />requesting we issue his son a building permit and that we have <br />offered to give him a permit if he will give us a deed which <br />could be held in escrow while he goes to court. <br />Attorney Vitunac noted that he would prefer to record the <br />deed because if we just hold it, the property possibly could be <br />sold off, but he would be willing to hold the deed since we know <br />the Jacksons. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if we have the ability to instruct <br />staff to issue the building permit without requiring the R/W, and <br />Attorney Vitunac advised that we do not; the ordinance would have <br />to be changed. <br />Attorney Jackson did not see where the County doesn't have <br />the authority to issue this permit pending this based on this <br />situation, and Commissioner Scurlock felt the County Attorney is <br />saying put the deed in escrow, go ahead and issue the permit, and <br />set a time limit for the Jacksons to file their action. <br />24 <br />JOCT 10 1989 <br />BOOK <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.