Laserfiche WebLink
Attorney Scurlock wished to add that in the interim we have <br />directed staff to prepare some approach to the alternatives that <br />were discussed today. <br />Commissioner Bird agreed to the above additions, and <br />the MOTION WAS THEN SECONDED by Commissioner Eggert. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />Commissioner Bird wished to know if we end up taking that <br />property without compensation and later do some assessment across <br />the board to acquire all the additional R/W and pay for it, then <br />how do we go back and repay Neal Jackson. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt the answer is that Mr. Jackson <br />can choose not to go ahead with his project and then hope to be <br />compensated in the future. - <br />Staff asked for clarification in regard to taking a test <br />district and looking at all the R/W acquisition needed for the <br />future and costing that out. <br />Commissioner Scurlock suggested doing it in 5 year phases, <br />and Director Davis noted that he was thinking of a 20 year plan. <br />Commissioner Scurlock believed we need to have some phasing, <br />and Administrator Chandler did not think we can make that kind of <br />determination today because there are many things that we will <br />have to look at. <br />Commissioner Bird reiterated that the Motion is for staff to <br />issue Mr. Jackson a building permit. He will prepare a deed to <br />the 30' in the name of the County to be held in his escrow <br />account; he has 60 days to file a lawsuit; and we will see what <br />happens in court. <br />At this point Attorney Vitunac brought up the fact that we <br />actually need 50', but we will buy the other 20'. He pointed <br />out that our ordinance requires the deficiency to be brought up <br />26 <br />EO T 10 X9 9 <br />J <br />BOOK /0 P' 1 1 <br />F <br />