My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/24/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
10/24/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:26:28 AM
Creation date
6/16/2015 8:09:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/24/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attorney Barkett stressed that they published in the <br />newspaper that they were going to ask for a continuance; they <br />wrote a letter to the people who were objecting; they also noti- <br />fied the Clerk to the Board and notified staff; so, they really <br />feel justified in requesting this continuance. <br />Discussion continued, and Commissioner Scurlock repeated <br />that he does not intend to second a Motion so he felt that takes <br />Attorney Barkett's options away. <br />County Attorney Vitunac advised that if a Motion is made, <br />the Chairman can second the Motion. <br />Commissioner Scurlock believed that is a change of policy, <br />and Attorney Barkett pointed out that the policy announced by <br />Vice Chairman Eggert earlier was that if two Commissioners were <br />absent, the Board would grant a request for continuance. <br />Commissioner Scurlock agreed that there has been a policy <br />that we would try to have a full Board present for a public <br />hearing. He noted that Commissioner Eggert will be absent for <br />the next meeting, and he will be absent the one after that; so, <br />he then would suggest a 90 day continuance because he did not <br />want to let Attorney Barkett pick which Commissioners may or may <br />not be here. <br />Attorney Barkett advised that he could agree with a continu- <br />ance to November 14th, but he has not been authorized to go <br />further. <br />Discussion continued regarding various dates, and it was <br />noted that the Board is the one that sets the date and a.full <br />Board will not be present until November 21st. <br />0 C 2 41989 <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bowman, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Scurlock to table Central Assembly of <br />God's request until November 21st when a full Board <br />can be present. <br />23 <br />per, � � •6 <br />BODK 8 F',4�JE 2►3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.