11/14/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

the ability within his agreement with the tenants to pass the charges through to them. We couldn't differentiate between which tenants can get the pass through and which can't, because it really isn't our business to be involved in the leases. Commissioner Bowman asked how the impact fees would be applied to the current vacant sites and undeveloped sites, and Director Pinto explained that the park owner will have to pay those impact fees at the time a unit is put on the lot. The park owner owns the lot and rents the sites to the tenants who own mobile homes or RVs. Director Pinto noted that there are two treatment plants within the park at the present time, and had to admit that for the type of plants they are, the park has done a fairly good job in upkeep. However, the plants are old and the percolation ponds are really within the lake system of the park and could be a future problem, if not an existing problem. He felt this is a good agreement, and recommended approval. There being no further questions of staff, Chairman Wheeler opened the Public Hearing, and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. Richard Negley, regional manager of Aspen Whispering Palms Limited Partnership, wished to clarify a couple of things that Mr. Pin -to has referenced. First, there are both mobile home sites and RV sites in the park. The RV sites, through the dialogue they had with the County, were set at a lesser rate than the mobile home sites. Secondly, the owners have no doubt that the impact fees can be passed through to the owners of the mobile homes, and he wished to make that fact clear to the people who are in attendance this morning who own mobile homes in Whispering Palm Mobile Village. It is the opinion of the park owners' attorneys and the opinion of the Department of Business Regulation that the impact fees can be passed through to the owners of those mobile homes. NN O V 689 13 �P , BOOK! F4,E