Laserfiche WebLink
NOV 14 <br />BOOK 7 8 FACE 3 j x <br />Director Pinto pointed out that the enforcement of our <br />agreement and the collection of the fees is a matter of how the <br />Board wants to proceed, but in no way, shape or form are we going <br />to be taking any action of collection against a tenant in that <br />mobile home park. If it isn't paid, our action would be against <br />the park owner. <br />Commissioner Bird asked where in the agreement it says that <br />we are dragging in a third party, and Mr. John pointed out that <br />under Item 5 of the agreement it says that any impact fee for <br />water or sewer may be paid as follows: a) in cash at the time of <br />connection to the county system, b) over ten years beginning at <br />the time of connection to the county system pursuant to the <br />standard payment plan then in effect, or c) pursuant to the <br />deferral method set forth in this paragraph and paragraph 7. Mr. <br />John believed that wording in item (a) raises the question of who <br />would be paying the cash, the park owner or the people who are <br />renting, and that Item (b) seems to indicate that it is not the <br />park owner who is going to pay it. He felt that Item (c) means <br />that when you sell your mobile home, then you have to pay the <br />impact fee, and it is the park owner who has the right to pursue <br />the matter with those that are there already. Mr. John suggested <br />that all of that language be deleted from the agreement, because <br />the County has an agreement with the park owner and the County <br />cannot obligate the renters to pay for anything. That is a <br />matter for the park owner to discuss with those people who are <br />renting. He wondered what happens if at sometime in the future <br />the park owner sells the land after all the impact fees are paid. <br />Would the owner pocket the profit? He felt the agreement that <br />the County has negotiated is faulty in more ways than one. <br />Commissioner Eggert noted that Item #5 does mention <br />"occupants", and Director Pinto explained that the County has to <br />recognize that there are occupants there. <br />Commissioner Eggert asked if the land owner on the sale of <br />his land would have to pay all the impact fees, and Director <br />18 <br />