11/14/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

put into a rental agreement. Mr. Ramsey expressed his appreciation for the Commission's response to the public's questions on this document. Commissioner Eggert understood that this agreement states that the park owner is obligated to pay these impact fees for the benefit of each site and that the sale of a unit triggers his requirement to pay, and he gets the money to pay. In other words, this is not triggering the tenant to pay, but is triggering the owner to pay. Attorney Vitunac stated that is correct. The owner has 3 choices. He may pay in cash; he may sign each site up for a 10 -year payment plan; or he may do nothing until the unit turns over and then he owes the whole thing at once. Commissioner Bird asked about the RV sites, and Attorney Vitunac explained that the options would be either cash or a 10 -year payment plan, because there isn't going to be anything to trigger a sale because there are no units on there to sell. Commissioner Eggert asked what happens if an owner of a mobile home sold his unit and just moved away. Would the owners of the park be obligated to pay that impact fee whether or not they have gotten any money from the owner of the mobile home at the time of the sale? Attorney Vitunac confirmed that would be the case, but noted that the word "tenant" is not used in the agreement. Commissioner Eggert pointed out that the agreement does refer to the occupants and taking them on as customers. Attorney Vitunac suggested that if it would make the Board feel better, we can add a paragraph at the end of this agreement that says by signing this agreement the County in no way makes a decision on whether the park owner or the tenants have to pay any impact fees. Commissioner Eggert felt that we have made a decision and that decision is that the owner has to pay, but how he gets that money is his business. NOV IL1989 23