Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Negley didn't feel that was reality. First of all, they <br />don't want to do it, and secondly, if they did, they could not <br />get it done. So, the park is going to continue to be operated as <br />a mobile home and RV park. <br />Mr. Negley next addressed the fact that although there has <br />not been a mobile home removed from that park since they <br />purchased it on September 1, 1982, if a person were to move a <br />home out of that park now, next year, or four or 7 years from <br />now, they have the right to do that, and the park owners would <br />pay the impact fee on the site. That is spelled out pretty well <br />in the agreement, as well as in their lease agreement. As Mr. <br />Pinto explained earlier, the whole idea of the deferral was to <br />take the burden off the people who are presently in the park, and <br />say that at sometime within a 12 -year period when the units is <br />sold, the impact fee must be paid. <br />Commissioner Eggert pointed out that it also takes the <br />burden off of the park owners in paying it immediately, and Mr. <br />Negley admitted that it does, but pointed out that the burden <br />rolls right back over to the residents. <br />Commissioner Eggert emphasized that is exactly the <br />residents' main problem. <br />Mr. Negley felt the residents' problem is that they don't <br />want to pay the impact fee, period. The park owners' problem is <br />that the total impact fees are $780,000, and as Chairman Wheeler <br />pointed out, when you have expenses, they have to be offset by <br />income, and there is no way the park owners can take a $780,000 <br />hit and not have somebody else pay it. <br />Commissioner Bowman understood there was a law passed <br />several years ago as a result of lobbying by the Florida Mobile <br />Homeowners that says you can't put people out any more. It can't <br />be done, and Attorney Vitunac interjected that it makes it very <br />difficult. <br />NOV 14 199 <br />27 <br />BOOK. <br />(0 F{GE <br />