11/14/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

NMI triggers this payment is a sale. After reading the agreement again, she didn't see that this agreement itself is putting it back on the park tenants, except for that one paragraph that we felt was a little loose. How this gets back on the tenants is a problem with the leases that the tenants are being asked to sign with the park owners. She agreed with Commissioner Bird that the agreement very definitely puts it on the back of the owners of the park. Mr. Ramsey felt that the tenants do understand that the bottom line is that it always is the owner of the park, but -in dealing with these people, they find that they hang on every period that is in a contract, and if it isn't spelled out clearly, it becomes a dispute. Commissioner Bird advised that if there is any misunder- standing in the future, the records of this meeting are all transcribed, and Commissioner Eggert noted that we can add a paragraph making our intent very clear. Mr. Ramsey pointed out that all these people showed up here this morning because they realize that this would be their opportunity to at Least express their views. Mrs. Chuhaloff urged the Commission to indicate clearly that it is the park owners' responsibility. She objected to the language in Item #7 where it says that "the Park shall pay or cause to be paid out the then -current water impact fees for the mobile home sites which have not had their impact fees paid", because she interpreted that to mean that the owner could pass the impact fees through to the tenants, but Director Pinto stressed that particular language had to be included. Chairman Wheeler explained that we are going to add a paragraph that makes it very clear that the intent of this whole contract is that it is the landlord who has the sole responsibility for the impact fees. N O V 1 4 11989 29 BOOK 78 PAGE 335