11/21/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

NOV G1X989 BOOK 78 PAGE 428 Assistant County Attorney Will Collins felt it would be questionable in February, but it is appropriate under the present Comp Plan. All zoning must be in conformance with the land use plan, and if you have residential zoning, you are not in conformance if you put non-residential zoning uses in there after that time. There may be such a thing as a holding category where until such time as the property develops, some less intense uses may be appropriate. However, if the Board made a determination that this will be residential in the future under the Comp Plan, the zoning should be consistent with it, and you shouldn't have zoning uses which you have determined are not compatible with what your future land use is going to be. The zoning is supposed to follow the plan. Attorney Collins believed that once a plan is adopted, the Board should not be approving zoning categories that are in conflict with your future land use designation. Commissioner Eggert understood that currently it is alright with the State to have agricultural zoning in a low -intensity residential designation. Commissioner Scurlock felt that is a moot point since what we have to do is establish what criteria exists today, and Director Keating confirmed that the present criteria is what must be considered today. Mr. Duryea also pointed out that originally this station was supposed to be non profit, but now we are hearing that it is going to be renting out space. Attorney Vitunac explained that none of that is germane, and if there were a different radio station there, that would be fine, too. The content is not relevant today; there could be Christian music or other music broadcast. John Alexander of Vista Plantation was concerned about the church's overall plan, and wondered why church went ahead and spent $100,000 on this tower without the knowledge that they could put this tower up. He didn't feel this is good business. 28