Laserfiche WebLink
Chairman Wheeler felt we should give someone the benefit of <br />the doubt on a first offense, but wished to know if there is any <br />way that we can speed up the process when we have a recurring <br />nuisance such as this so that the neighborhood does not have to <br />keep putting up with an eyesore every few months. <br />Director Keating advised that staff is working on that with <br />the attorneys office now. <br />Commissioner Bowman was concerned that we may not be <br />charging enough overhead on a matter such as this as she felt <br />sure it must cost much more than $105 in staff time, etc., to <br />process these things. <br />Commissioner Scurlock expressed the hope that if any of our <br />enterprise fees need increasing that we look into it to make sure <br />we get the proper compensation. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard as <br />this is a public discussion item, and there were none. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- <br />missioner Bird, the Board unanimously (4-0) adopted <br />Resolution 89-146 assessing costs of weed nuisance <br />abatement. <br />NOV 2 8 1989 <br />9 <br />BGGK. 78 E',1 466 <br />