Laserfiche WebLink
DEC 5 F2 <br />BOOK 78 F'. L 553 <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by Com- <br />missioner Eggert, the Board unanimously approved <br />staff recommendation for compensation of $4,000 to <br />D. Victor Knight and an additional R/W purchase from <br />D. Victor Knight in the amount of $58,854 and also <br />approved Budget Amendment #015, as follows: <br />TO: Members of the Board <br />of County Commissioners <br />FROM: Joseph A. Baird, OMB Direct <br />SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENT <br />NUMBER: 015 <br />DATE: November 29. 1989 <br />Entry <br />$umber <br />Funds/Detartment/Account Name <br />Account Number <br />Increase <br />Decrease <br />1. <br />EXPENSES <br />INDIAN RIVER BLVD. NORTH <br />Richt-of-Way <br />309-214-541-066.12 <br />$18.800.00 <br />$ 0 <br />$ 0 <br />$18,800.00 <br />Reserve for Contingency <br />309-214-541-099.91 <br />• <br />Commissioner Bird asked if this just about concludes the R/W <br />acquisition on Phase IV of the Boulevard, and Director Davis <br />advised that we are taking one at a time on Phase IV trying to <br />get them to closing. Phase IV is from 37th Street to 53rd <br />Street, and we are still working on Phase III. <br />Assistant County Attorney Collins reported that a week or so <br />ago he got approval for a number of acquisitions, some of which <br />required minor revisions, but he believed we are on track. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked where we are on the mitigation <br />required by DER at the ratio of 10 to 1. <br />Director Davis advised that he just FAXED a table to DER <br />which inventories the quality of the wetlands in Boulevard Phase <br />III all the way through the project, and they are considering <br />that now. DER is in contact with an attorney representing Mr. <br />Hoffman, who has been keeping a careful watch on what they are <br />doing, and we are hoping to hear something real soon on whether <br />they grant the permit or not. <br />Commissioner Scurlock wished to know, if the DER holds to <br />the 10 to 1 ratio as opposed to 5 to 1, can we not again consider <br />48 <br />