Laserfiche WebLink
DEC 12 1989 <br />Boor. ! mE 602 <br />CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE CONSULTANT <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 12/7/89: <br />DATE: DECEMBER 7, 1989 <br />TO: <br />THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />FROM: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTO <br />DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERV CES <br />SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE CONSULTANT <br />BACKGROUND: <br />On November 9, 1989 approximately fifteen County initiated Request For <br />Proposals were mailed for the subject project. There were six (6) <br />responses received on November 27, 1989. The selection committee was <br />appointed by the County Administrator which was comprised of: <br />Gary C. Wheeler - County Commissioner <br />James E. Chandler - County Administrator <br />James Davis - Public Works Director <br />H.T. "Sonny" Dean - General Services Director <br />This committee met on November 29, 1989 to "short list" the <br />consultants and select a date for presentations. A pre -designed form <br />using points for qualifications in various areas of importance was <br />the methodology used in this process. Total points from each <br />committee member's form determined ranking of the firms that <br />submitted proposals. The short list was made up of the firms <br />receiving the highest number of points. These companies were <br />notified and presentations were scheduled and heard on December 6, <br />1989. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />The short listed consultants were judged on their past experience in <br />similar projects, personnel qualifications, what they perceived to be <br />the important aspects of the project, and how well they were prepared <br />to perform the various tasks. The committee ranked the consultants <br />-based on the majority votes received as follows: <br />1. Sverdrup, Corporation <br />2. Rooney Enterprises, Inc. <br />3. Proctor Construction, Company <br />RECOMMENDATIONS: <br />Staff respectfully request Board approval to negotiate with Sverdrup, <br />Corporation, for a contract to perform the subject consulting work. <br />The proposed contract will be brought back to the Board of County <br />Commissioners for their approval. <br />28 <br />