Laserfiche WebLink
DEC 1 G <br />BOOK 18 F;E 6. 2 <br />built on any of those remaining lots, and Mr. Boling explained <br />that it would unless someone came in and obtained a variance, <br />using the same argument that they have a,lot of depth and a lot of <br />uplands area even though it is zoned RS -1. <br />Commissioner Bird felt we have a unique situation here and <br />some precedence established because we have allowed people to <br />build on both sides of the road, but it was his opinion that <br />Ambersand Subdivision was created as, and should remain, a single- <br />family subdivision. He felt that perhaps we should allow it on <br />this one additional lot and then allow no more. <br />Chairman Wheeler asked how we would deny the owner of Lot 5 <br />if he came in with the same request, and Director Keating <br />explained that is the reason the Board of Adjustment is asking the <br />Board to consider making a policy decision on this matter. <br />Attorney Vitunac explained that this plat was filed in 1954 <br />showing ocean to river lots 50 -ft. in width with a road down the <br />middle called Ocean Boulevard. The road was eventually built as <br />AIA in a slightly different location; the lots were still ocean to <br />river; people have bought them knowing the road was either there <br />or going to be there, and that they had one lot for one house. He <br />didn't know what machination Attorney O'Haire's clients did to get <br />two deeds. They may have requested it or it may have been inter- <br />family, he didn't know. Attorney O'Haire hasn't said that they <br />didn't have a hand in getting a deed to each side of the lot. <br />Attorney Vitunac believed they did that so that they could sell <br />off one, take the profit and build on the other and end up with a <br />free house. That would be fine, except that it is a self-created <br />hardship. They are trying to use the relocation of Ocean <br />Boulevard to AIA as a means to double the amount of houses, but <br />the lots are substandard. Attorney Vitunac stated that there is <br />no wrong that the County has done except for one thing, and that <br />is that sometime in the past they let two houses go in that should <br />not have gone in. The County consistently takes a position that <br />38 <br />b <br />