My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/21/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
12/21/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:35:33 AM
Creation date
6/16/2015 8:32:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/21/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 78 PAGE i40 <br />Commissioner Scurlock wished it on the record that the 201 <br />Facility Plan, which did provide for one regional plant along the <br />Indian River north of Grand Harbor, has been updated and <br />modified. He noted that it has been suggested to him that the <br />comment about the 201 Facility Plan doesn't make any sense <br />because we have never followed it; we didn't have a current plan; <br />and it has not been modified; and that is not correct. <br />Director Pinto advised that whoever made that comment is <br />still "back in the dark ages" and hasn't been following what is <br />going on currently. Our appearance before the State Board was <br />talking about the 201 Facility Plan and what is best on a county <br />level, and we have no alternative but to look at that. Director <br />Pinto noted that if he were sitting on the City side, however, <br />there are a couple of assumptions, he would make also. If he <br />could unload the problem of septic tanks and subtract that, that <br />would keep the costs down for just sludge, and if he could make <br />the decision, even for Indian River County, that we are going to <br />land spread in St. Lucie County because it is the cheapest way, <br />that would be his recommendation if he thought we could get away <br />with it. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt we must not be too critical of <br />the City's decision - we must recognize that we have different <br />constituencies and a different perspective. <br />Commissioner Eggert did not believe Director Pinto is being <br />critical, but just saying that City has a very valid reason for <br />doing what it feels it should do. <br />Administrator Chandler commented that in meetings with the <br />City staff, they mainly had a difference on the long range <br />solution and the different directions we feel are the right way <br />to go. When they made that decision on sludge, however, the <br />thing that still impacts us and what we must be concerned about <br />is the septic part of it. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked if we can't set an appropriate <br />rate for that. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.