My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/21/1989
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1989
>
12/21/1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 10:35:33 AM
Creation date
6/16/2015 8:32:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/21/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEG 21 Ha <br />BOOK .78 PAGE <br />Larry Adams, Vice President of CDM, next took the floor to <br />review rates and noted that the total program costs shown in the <br />preceding graph do not include the bond.financing costs. Mr. <br />Adams referred to the following graph comparing monthly charges <br />with and without the City participating: <br />0 <br />PRELIMINARY COMPARISON OF MONTHLY CHARGES <br />WITH ESTIMATED CHARGES PRESENTED <br />AT PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 25,1987 <br />PRESENT ESTIMATE <br />CUSTOMER WITH WITHOUT <br />TYPE PUBLIC HEARING CITY CITY <br />SEPTIC TANK $1.37 $1.38 $2.20 <br />GREASE TRAP $24.36 25.33 $27.08 <br />SEWERED HOME $2.79 $2.56 $4.23 <br />Mr. Adams noted that if the City were still in the program, <br />the charges would be very similar to what was estimated in 1987. <br />Without them the costs do increase, and the cost for a sewered <br />single family home would go to $4.23 per month. Essentially, <br />that cost per sewered home is with the 1990 estimated customer <br />base carrying all of the cost. Mr. Adams noted that Commissioner <br />Scurlock mentioned the possibility of impact fees, and that is a <br />viable approach to reduce that amount. His initial calculation <br />showed that an impact fee in a range between $100/200 could be <br />appropriate. <br />Commissioner Scurlock noted that if the City withdraws and <br />we build excess capacity, then the question is who should pay for <br />that and who is it reserved for. <br />Discussion continued regarding rates, and Mr. Adams ex- <br />plained that they have calculated the rate structure assuming <br />that the facility is a regional facility. By regional facility, <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.