Laserfiche WebLink
M M M <br />committee, but would like to suggest that a member of the Bar <br />Association also be appointed to that group. <br />Administrator Chandler took the responsibility for the lack <br />of adequate notice, as he had assumed that Judge Geiger had <br />related that information to the other Judges after meeting with <br />him on December 29th to schedule this workshop meeting. <br />Judge Vocelle emphasized that the Judges feel the renovation <br />of the present Courthouse had been a disaster, and wanted to see <br />an architect selected for this project who has specific expertise <br />in the design of court facilities. When the architect is <br />selected, the Judges want to be able to communicate with one <br />person rather than 9 or 10 representatives of that firm. Judge <br />Kanarek, Judge Smith, and himself would like to recommend Concept <br />"A" because everything is in one complex and the design provides <br />for future expansion and calls for the demolition of the old <br />Courthouse except for the facade. <br />As a member of the Historical Society and being from a <br />pioneer family, Judge Vocelle didn't want to have a confrontation <br />with the Historical Society, but he felt it would be a terrible <br />mistake to retain the present structure for a lot of reasons, <br />mainly because it isn't functional. It had trouble the day it <br />was built, because it was built on a muck pond. They feel that <br />the historical value can be retained in ways other than retaining <br />that structure. <br />Judge Vocelle read the following letter into the record: <br />20 <br />JAN 111990, BOOK 9'i AuL <br />