My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/23/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
1/23/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:43 PM
Creation date
6/5/2015 12:50:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/23/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f <br />aJUK d C7 F. �E1t <br />CONTRACT` W/HYDROPRO_(RIVERS EDGE WATER TREAT_ PLANT) FINAL CHANGE <br />ORDERS #1 & #2 <br />The Board reviewed memo from Director Pinto: <br />DATE: DECEMBER 21, 1989 <br />TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO <br />DIRECTOR OF UTILITIC ERVICES <br />SUBJECT: RIVERS EDGE WATER TREATMENT PLANT CONTRACT <br />WITH HYDROPRO, INC. <br />FINAL CHANGE ORDERS NO. 1 AND NO. 2 <br />IRC PROJECT NO. UW -88 -04 -WC <br />PREPARED AND STAFFED BY: WILLIAM F. MCCAIN <br />CAPITAL PROJECTS R <br />DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES <br />BACKGROUND <br />On July 17, 1989, the Board of County Commissioners approved the <br />award of a contract to construct a water treatment plant at Rivers <br />Edge to Hydropro, Inc.; originally, it was intended that the job be <br />completed without payment and performance bonds, as a manufacturer's <br />warranty accompanied the reverse osmosis equipment. It was also <br />intended that we reuse several of the existing components at the old <br />water treatment plant. <br />The bonds were required by both the Budget and Purchasing <br />Departments before we could have the contract executed, so they were <br />secured. The bond costs are to be covered by Change Order No. 1. <br />The existing equipment we intended to use has deteriorated to the <br />point that it should not be reused'at the new plant. Therefore, we <br />are requesting a Change Order No. 2, to replace this equipment. <br />ANALYSIS <br />The cost associated with the change orders are as follows: <br />Change Order No. 1. Add construction performance and $2,500.00 <br />payment bonds <br />Change Order No. 2. Replace unusable existing equipment $3.373.25 <br />TOTAL $5,873.25 <br />`-'.':-(See attached change orders and back-up material) <br />y �LRECOMMENDATION <br />lrl* <br /><.The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the <br />;=-Board of County Commissioners approve the. attached change orders <br />= i-- with Hydropro, Inc. <br />E <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by;.Com- <br />missioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved <br />Change Order No. 1 and Change Order No. 2 with Hydropro <br />as recommended by staff. <br />42 <br />r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.