Laserfiche WebLink
FEB <br />1990 <br />aooK <br />! 9 <br />FACE <br />With regard <br />to Item 5, Director Baird explained <br />that <br />in <br />the <br />past we have not budgeted the Tax Collector's fees in the <br />M.S.T.U. and have always paid the fees from the General Fund. <br />For proper cost allocation, the staff estimates the M.S.T.U.'s <br />pro rata share of the Tax Collector's fee should be paid from the <br />M.S.T.U. Item 5 increases Revenue Cash Forward October 1, 1989 <br />and increases the line item expense Tax Collector's fees in the <br />amount of $35,000. <br />Director Baird explained that we did not reduce the General <br />Fund's budget because the Tax Collector may be coming in for a <br />change due to the new assessment districts we created and we are <br />not sure what that is going to do. Since the Tax Collector is a <br />fee officer, the amount we show in the budget is the net amount <br />of the fees he earns. His budget is about $1.2 million, but we <br />only pay about $350,000 of it because he earns the rest from fees <br />for car tags, etc., and turns back the money to the County. <br />Chairman Eggert wondered if we should do all of this at the <br />same time rather than in dribbles, and Director Baird advised <br />that we can clear up this one right now, but the other one is <br />going to take time and he would like to move it over, get it out <br />of the way, and start reassessing the funds as the Tax Collector <br />makes his collections. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved <br />Item 5 on Budget Amendment 031, as recommended by <br />OMB Director Baird. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, the Board unanimously approved <br />the entire Budget Amendment 031, as modified in Items 3 <br />and 5. <br />17 <br />I <br />