Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Scurlock asked if we have contacted the <br />surveyor to tell him he may be on the hook, and Director Davis <br />stated that we are certainly making contact with him. <br />Mr. Schlitt noted that there have been at least 8 houses <br />built in the last 24 months and he didn't feel that one surveyor <br />had necessarily done all of those, but Director Davis didn't feel <br />that we have had 8 houses in 24 months. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt that the bottom line is that <br />debating it here won't really serve any purpose, and emphasized <br />that we have directed the County Administrator to tighten up on <br />this procedure. <br />Administrator Chandler explained that the problem has been <br />recognized on this particular situation, and we just don't want <br />to get in any deeper nor do we want to put the property owners in <br />the same situation that Mr. Schlitt is in. We are just going to <br />tighten up and figure out a better way. <br />Commissioner Bowman believed that Mr. Schlitt has a case <br />against the surveyor. <br />ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD - PHASE IV <br />The Board reviewed the.following memo dated 1129/90: <br />TO: James E. Chandler, <br />County Administrator <br />FROM: James W. Davis, P.E., <br />Public Works Director <br />SUBJECT: Release of Partial Retention - Engineering <br />Services for Indian River Blvd. Phase IV - <br />Glace and Radcliffe, Inc. <br />DATE: January 29, 1990 <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />The engineering design of Indian River Boulevard Phase IV is <br />essentially complete. Regulatory permit applications have <br />been submitted and staff is responding to agency comments. <br />Since the original design contract with Glace and Radcliffe, <br />Inc. authorized a fee of $285,825, loo retainage in the. <br />amount of $28,582.50 is being held back for payment. The <br />PFEB 6 199U <br />80 BOOK P;GF - 86 <br />