2/13/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOOK f'�Gr pu•t in a policy that the Conservation areas will be more specifically defined when an environmental survey is done. He was not sure that particular property was all estuarine wetlands. Commissioner Bird asked what this is now under the present plan, and Director Keating believed it is Conservation, and it is 1 upa. Chairman Eggert believed staff wants to change it to 1 unit to 40 acres and then do an analysis or do they want to leave it 1 to 1 and do an analysis. Director Keating explained that staff wants to change it to the Conservation that is east of 1-95, which is 1 unit per 40 acres if you want to go try to get the dredge and fill permits and build in it, but have it the same as it is now densitywise (1 upa) if you transfer it out. He noted they must think that it is all wetlands because they are talking about the density transfer provision. We are saying that we need to put in a policy, just in case he has some uplands on the property, that those uplands should not be designated Conservation and that he may actually have the ability to transfer from the wetlands to the uplands on that tract at the rate of 1 upa. Commissioner Scurlock asked if we, therefore, don't have to take any action and can just leave it the way it is? Director Keating noted we want to add that policy, but further noted that Environmental Planner Roland DeBlois tells him this may be all wetlands, and then staff recommends no action. Discussion next went to the Coraci property and their concern about the Conservation area by the Sebastian River. Chairman Eggert noted that Coraci objects -to 1 unit to 5 acres east of 1-95 and to the 1 to 40 to the west. They want 1 to 1 or better yet 5 to 1. Director Keating advised that is essentially the same as the property we were just talking about - it does have 1 unit to 1 acre if you are transferring it to adjacent uplands. 98 M M _I