Laserfiche WebLink
Urban Service Area to include that, too. At this point it seems <br />this is the best line based on the density that we have, but 5 <br />years down the road, we may look at it differently and then you <br />can move the line back and forward. <br />Attorney Kneller agreed that Mr. Rohani has a good point, <br />but noted that not all large developments are required to go <br />under a DRI. He had one further point, which is that the 1/1 <br />transfer of development rights from the Conservation area just <br />doesn't work because the .2 ratio is prohibiting you from trans- <br />ferring those rights. Attorney Kneller stated that Norpak <br />Corporation objects to Objective 2 and recommends that it be <br />stricken. <br />Chairman Eggert believed if we have a situation like that <br />come up, then we can do exactly what we have been doing over the <br />last few years and take care of it in our regular Comp Plan <br />amendment time. <br />Commissioner Bird noted that you would have to do two things <br />if you are going to comply with this. First, you are going to <br />have to change the Urban Services Area boundary to encompass the <br />property that is requesting the change in the Comp Plan, and then <br />you are going to have to change the Land Use Plan. Commissioner <br />Bird stressed that if you think you want to encourage high <br />quality, low density, golf course community development, which <br />preserves a great amount of green space, and gives you a great <br />reuse capacity for effluent, there is hardly anywhere in the <br />urban service areas currently where you will see that occur. You <br />would have to amass too many properties to put together enough <br />acreage. He believed that unless you move that line in the next <br />20 years, you are going to prohibit that kind of development. <br />Director Keating felt if we do what they are suggesting, <br />which is to say that large developments can go wherever they want <br />and at whatever density they want as long as they provide the <br />infrastructure, we don't have a Plan any more. He would suggest <br />the Board let staff go back and work on what staff was directed <br />1 r <br />1 1 1 BOOK <br />Em 1 113 ���� <br />