2/13/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Fri BOOK . I F"GE 157 Corporation is the owner, of the W.W. Ranch, approximately 8000 acres, depicted in Exhibit "A". After rev iewinb the proposed Comprehensive Plan and the Objections, 1,ecommendations and Comments(OPLC) from the Department of Community Affairs (issued December 21st, 1939), the following objections are submitted: 1) Page 19, paragraph 28 of the aIRC report recommends residential density of one unit per forty acres upon conservation designations. The draft of the Comprehensive Plan submitted to the D1.1k, Policy 1.4 (page 39), stated a density of one unit per one acre east of I-95. Because the conservation designation is upon private property east of I-95, a reconbnended density of one unit per forty acres may constitute inverse condemnation by the County. _NorPak Corporation requests that the conservation density remain at one unit per one acre or a land use elesignation of 'Rural -2, Low -1, or Lo,r4-2 is placer upon the land presently designated as conservation upon Exhibit "A". 2) Page J, paragraph J; page 13, paragraph 18(0); pave 16, paragraph 24; page 17, paragraph 25; page 18/19, paragraph 23, of the O:tC report reco:nnend less intense densities and land designations east of I-95. A population -based plan: a) -lay lead to the ignoring of regional dynamics, which will lead to more growth than the historical trend ;vouId indicate; b) Limits supply of developable land based on mainly historical growth trends; c) 'Chis more limited supply results in restricting the home building industry's access to lower-priced land; and, d) Phis restriction causes the value of land designated to accommodate the proposed population to increase abnormally, resulting in an increase in Nous i Ilg Costs . NorPak Corporation objects to any change upon the aural -1 designation upon the ,�.S. ranch east of I -J5, unless the change is to increase the density. 3) Page 18/ 1 J, pararapll 28 of the Ott- report recommends residential densities within agricultural designations from one unit per twenty acres to one unit per one hundred acres. NorPak Corporation objects to the recommended density and requests one unit per ten acres (or more intense) density for that designation. l) NorPak Corporation objects to the agricultural designation upon its land west of I-95 (see Lxhibit "A"). To properly plan a large tract of land (considering future infrastructure), it is necessary that arbitrary lines are not drawn on that land dividing a- ricultural and residential uses. NorPak Corporation requests residential and commercial/industrial designations :vest of I-95 upon EXIIi5it 50 M M -