My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/13/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
2/13/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:43 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 8:46:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/13/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VL D I J A90 BOOK .79 <br />Director Keating emphasized if you are designating it at <br />that density, you should expect development to come in at that. <br />Commissioner Wheeler noted that it is currently 1 units to 5 <br />acres, and he would like to see it stay at 1 unit to 5 acres. It <br />hasn't developed quickly at that density, but it does add value <br />to the property. <br />Chairman Eggert asked if anyone wished to be heard in regard <br />to the density question. <br />John Morrison came before the Board representing The Civic <br />Association and distributed the following graph addressing <br />densities suggested on the CLUP and relating them to specific <br />locations. He explained that it starts with the proposed <br />increase of density per acre and the -total square miles of total <br />acreage involved. Then removing 25% of that total acreage, you <br />arrive at buildable acreage and then applying the dwelling units <br />that would result from the increase in density, and then the <br />population figures: <br />70 <br />u <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.