2/13/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

F_ OOK Attorney Kneller wished to warn the County now that if that Conservation designation's purpose is to devalue the property around that Sebastian River, the County will be held liable, and since the Commissioners have notice, they face potential personal liability. Norpak objects to the Conservation designation and objects to any density less than 1 upa. Attorney Kneller had one further objection. The changes to the Future Land Use Element, Objective 2, says that by 1991 all new residential development greater than .2 upa, or 1 unit for 5 acres commercial/industrial development, shall occur within the urban service areas which contain the infrastructure and serv- ices. Public and private ventures will not always be within the urban service area. It is the ability of large owners to put in the infrastructure and enter into agreements with municipali- ties, and donate millions of dollars, and do what constitutes wise planning. Attorney Kneller concluded that Norpak requests that the AG designation west of 1-95 be at 1 upa and east of 1-95 anywhere from 1 upa to 5 upa; that the Conservation designation be stricken from the Sebastian River; and thatmorecommercial and industrial opportunites be provided on their parcel so it can be properly planned. Attorney Darrell Fennell came before the Board representing the Carson Platt Estate and referred to the comments in his letter which was earlier made a part of the record. Attorney Fennell commented that it would appear there is a thought process here that would concur with what many of the landowners seem to feel would be reasonable, or 1 upa. It is certain that agricultural property will remain agricultural to a large extent, and reducing it to 1 upa will not cause it to develop all of a sudden. One unit per 40 acres, in essence, is saying you can't use the property, and he believed the Board appears to agree and be leaning in that direction. 78 M M