My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/13/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
2/13/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:43 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 8:46:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/13/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1g9®BOOK NAI -18' <br />Mr. Nyquist explained that his 14 acre parcel is currently <br />zoned IL for the first 300' off Old Dixie, and the balance is <br />RM -6. The proposed Land Use change would designate it L-2 <br />whereby the whole parcel would be residential. He is here today <br />to ask for some relief from that designation. The south boundary <br />of his property has existing warehousing, with Old Dixie to the <br />east, the FEC railroad, and heavy commercial zoned property, and <br />he would like to maintain some type of buffering between the <br />residential and heavy commercial. When he purchased this <br />property in 1983, the entire acreage was zoned Industrial, and in <br />1985, the use was changed and it was zoned to keep a 300' strip <br />of IL along Old Dixie to buffer the residential from the heavy <br />commercial. Mr. Nyquist believed there is very little property <br />fronting on Old Dixie that has no type of industrial or <br />commercial use. <br />Commissioner Bird asked why we are indicating a change on <br />this property, and Director Keating believed the Chamber of <br />Commerce noted that industrial isn't too good along this corri- <br />dor. Also, we have major problems with the roadway up here. <br />This is one of those issues we have talked about for years; staff <br />took a closer look; and this is one of the few cases where we <br />have eliminated some commercial in the Plan. Actually, it is not <br />too good no matter which way you go. <br />In further discussion, it was noted that this parcel is in a <br />county enclave almost in the middle of Sebastian. <br />Mr. Nyquist stressed that it is right on the railroad tracks <br />and is not really desirable for residential. <br />Commissioner Bird asked if we couldn't leave the 300' IL <br />adjacent to the railroad and Old Dixie, and then have the resi- <br />dential to the west. <br />Director Keating noted that essentially is the way we have <br />it now with the MXD and then the way it is zoned. Issues were <br />brought up before that this isn't the best way to have industrial <br />uses, and staff made the recommendation to eliminate the IL. <br />80 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.