Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />'QC <br />BOOK i II'll <br />effectively in conjunction with transfer of development rights <br />programs 7-I Fie mixed-use area cTusters ar`e cTearTy-deTned`as <br />receiving zones and the-surro`unUF rura-T-areas are des'ig'nated as <br />sendin zones." ---- "— <br />Attorney Barkett believed that is the concept the Board <br />discussed earlier, but pointed ou-t that if these are the <br />receiving zones and the core areas of the mixed use clusters, the <br />1 unit to 40 acres will not work because there are no densities <br />to transfer into the receiving zones. He noted that Mr. McQueen <br />will now elaborate on what the nodal concept they propose would <br />involve, as well as 1 upa for the areas west of 1-95. <br />Darrell McQueen came before the Board and referred to the <br />Brevard County Land Use Plan. He advised that the DCA recom- <br />mended 1 unit to 40 acres for the south end of Brevard County <br />west of 1-95. Brevard County was proposing the same densities <br />for their new Plan as proposed on their 81/82 Land Use Map, and <br />the DCA found them not in compliance, not particularly because of <br />the density, but for other things. The Ag community up there got <br />together with the Commission and went to Tallahassee to the <br />Governor's office and came out with the following densities. For <br />example, they were proposing 1 unit per 21 acres, and they came <br />out with 1 upa for part; the largest area, they came out with 1 <br />unit per 5 acres, which was a decrease from the 1 to 21 acres <br />that they were proposing. <br />Mr. McQueen believed the AG people and the leaders of this <br />community are prepared to go to Tallahassee with the Commission <br />and work towards a meeting with the Governor to that end, and <br />they would ask that the Board modify the Plan to include all of <br />the AG zoning as 1 unit to 5 acres. Mr. McQueen then handed out <br />the following maps: <br />84 <br />1 <br />