Laserfiche WebLink
F_ <br />FEB 2` 0 1990 <br />BOOK A <br />VISTA ROYALE WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS - CHANGE ORDER #1 <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 2/26/90: <br />DATE: JANUARY 26, 1990 <br />TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />THRU: TERRANCE G. PINTO <br />DIRECTOR OF UTILITY SERVICES <br />PREPARED JOHN F. LANG &�, <br />AND STAFFED ENVIRONMENTAL PECIALIST <br />BY: DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES o <br />SUBJECT: VISTA ROYALE WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS <br />CHANGE ORDER #1 <br />BACKGROUND <br />The Department has entered into a contract with IFAS (University of <br />Florida) and St. Johns River Water Management District for an <br />effluent reuse study. The Department is obligated to install an <br />irrigation system in the County grove. The firm of Allen's <br />Environmental Equipment, Inc., has previously removed tanks of the <br />type necessary for the project, and erected same for the Department. <br />This firm is currently under contract with the County. <br />ANALYSIS <br />The Department is currently utilizing Allen Environmental to perform <br />identical work as required at the County Grove. That work consists <br />of refurbishing and installing a small ground storage tank (7,500 <br />gallons) with appropriate flanges and constructing the associated <br />yard piping. The Department desires to include this work in the <br />change order to start the irrigation project at the County Grove. <br />The cost will be $11,000.00, and this will extend the completion <br />time of the Vista Royale Improvements Project by 15 calendar days, <br />as the same crew will be utilized for this work. The funding for <br />this project is to come from Account No. 472-000-169-082.00, the <br />Effluent Irrigation System work in Progress Account. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />The Department <br />Commissioners <br />work described <br />$11,000.00. <br />of Utility Services recommends to the Board of County <br />that the chairman execute the change order for the <br />previously at a cost increase for the project of <br />68 <br />