2/27/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

FEB 27 1990 BOOK TO: James Chandler County Administrator DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: l • Obert M. Keatin A CP- Community Develop i ent ector THRU: Sasan Rohani �aR. Chief, Long -Range Planning FROM: Robert M. Loeper �/tL Staff Planner DATE: February 19, 1990 SUBJECT: TY TARBY REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND REZONE 156 ACRES It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County Commissioners at its regular meeting of February 27, 1990. - DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: Ty Tarby, Trustee, has submitted a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan and rezone property. The subject property is located on the north side of S.R. 60 between 58th and 66th Avenues. The request includes 156 acres of a 214 acre parcel. The request entails changing the existing land use from M-1, Medium -Density Residential (up to 8 units per acre) to General Commercial Node, and rezoning the property from A-1, Agricultural District (1 unit/5 acres); RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (6 units/acre); and RM -6, Multi -Family Residential (6 units/acre) to CG, General Commercial District. This request is considered an expansion of the State Road 60 and Kings Highway Commercial Node from 160 acres to 316 acres. The purpose of this request is to secure the necessary land use designation and zoning for a regional shopping center. The Edward J. DeBartolo Corp., is proposing to construct a 707,000 square foot regional mall and 440,000 square feet of peripheral commercial space. The entire project is to be reviewed as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI). On September 1, 1989, Indian River County transmitted a substantially revised comprehensive plan to the State Department of Community Affairs for review as required by the State Growth Management Act. On February 13, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the new comprehensive plan. The adopted portion of the plan includes the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the various plan elements, a series of maps including the future land use map, and the narrative of the Capital Improvements Element. The remaining text constituting over 1500 pages was not adopted as part of the plan; however, this support data and analysis provide the basis for the plan. The adopted plan has been submitted to the state for compliance review as mandated by the State Growth Management Act. Regardless of the outcome of the compliance review, the plan enjoys the force of law and, as such, all development in the unincorporated portions of the county must adhere to the provisions of the plan. 40