Laserfiche WebLink
FEB 2 71990 Bou 69 FACE 422 <br />STATE OF FLORIDA <br />DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES <br />February 12, 1990 <br />Ivor Groves, Ph.D. <br />Assistant Secretary <br />Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health <br />1317 Winewood.Boulevard <br />Tallahassee, Florida 32399 <br />Dear Dr. Groves: <br />Due to recent events that have reflected less than optimal <br />communication between the State Program Office and District 9, we <br />are writing -to you to confirm that there is unanimous agreement <br />among us as to: <br />1) The number of appropriated CSU beds, by agency and the <br />funds related to them. <br />2) The number of unappropriated beds providing crisis <br />stabilization services that receive less than $113/daV. <br />3) The amount of funds needed by this District to bring <br />all unappropriated beds to $113 a day. <br />Please see the attached agreed upon analysis: We believe that if <br />we are all consistently operating off the same information base, <br />we will be much more effective in persuading the Legislature to <br />continue funding special Baker Act price level increases. <br />Due to the omission of the inpatient beds providing crisis <br />stabilization services at 45th Street from the calculations sent <br />to the Legislature and subsequently used to divide the price <br />level increase between the Districts, this District was shorted <br />approximately $200,000. <br />We are proud of the planning and foresight that resulted in this <br />District having nearly enough.crisis stabilization services to <br />meet our needs and significantly reduce State Hospitalization for <br />District 9 clients. However, if all of our beds are not included <br />in price level increases, we will have beds closed and the crisis <br />we are in with South Florida State Hospital will become <br />unmanageable for us all. <br />We request.that this data and only this data be used to make any <br />calculations, predictions, etc. about crisis stabilization <br />services in our District, and that we receive copies of all <br />Program Office communication with the Legislature about the <br />crisis stabilization needs of District 9. <br />We also request that any figures currently being used with the <br />Legislature be revised as necessary to reflect the total number <br />of unappropriated beds in District 9 eligible for price level <br />increase as stated herein. <br />Further, if there are any lapsed Baker Act funds statewide, we <br />would hope that these funds could be allocated to District 9 to <br />bring our rate per day for unappropriated beds closer to the <br />current state average. <br />Recognizing that $113 does not adequately support the costs of <br />crisis stabilization services and that ultimately we need to work <br />toward a rate of $148/day, but that a rate of $113/day is <br />considered a necessary step at this point, we hope that this <br />District will achieve $113/day for its unappropriated beds before <br />all the appropriated beds statewide are moved toward the $148 <br />rate per day. <br />In a related manner, we ask that the Baker Act funding cuts nottr <br />be permanent cuts to base funding, because permanent cuts will <br />result in this District not having a fully implemented 24 hour <br />74 <br />