Laserfiche WebLink
ANALYSIS: <br />Both the existing plat and the requested replat were reviewed <br />pursuant to section 10(g) of the subdivision ordinance, which <br />allows developers to "plat over" townhouse projects to allow fee <br />simple tansfer of property underneath and around the townhouse <br />units. Normal subdivision lot dimension and lot frontage require- <br />ments are waived for such projects. The approved project site <br />plan controls project construction while the plat delineates <br />common areas and creates lots that can be sold -off to unit owners. <br />The subject replat area (recreation tract) will receive water and <br />wastewater service from Indian River County through the existing <br />project infrastructure. The replat does not change any previously <br />approved road, drainage or utilities systems. <br />All applicable county requirements concerning final plat approval <br />for the replat request have been addressed. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant <br />final plat approval to the first replat of a portion of Cambridge <br />Park Subdivision. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commis- <br />sioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously granted Final <br />Plat Approval to the First Replat of Cambridge Park <br />Subdivision. <br />COUNTY HEALTH UNIT PROJECT - BID #90-44 <br />General Services Director Dean reviewed the following: <br />DATE: MARCH 6, 1990 <br />TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />FROM: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTOR <br />DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVI S <br />SUBJECT: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HEALTH UNIT PROJECT <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY BID NUMBER 90-44 <br />BACKGROUND: <br />As authorized by the Board the subject project was advertised for bid <br />and opened on February 28,. 1990. There were four submittals <br />received. All bids were evaluated by Lemuel Ramos and Associates, <br />architect for the project and his recommendation is attached. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />Low bid was submitted by Miorelli Engineering, Inc. out of Melbourne <br />and met all requirements. A recap of the bids and alternates is <br />attached. <br />MAR131990 3 5 NOOK f 1( `t 54 + <br />