Laserfiche WebLink
AR 2 0 1990 <br />Boos .� f��i:5 <br />have lost all the land eventually for back taxes if the County <br />had not jumped in and offered $100,000 for it. Mr. Levy thought <br />that Mr. Pinto or the County Attorney would have checked the <br />boundaries of that utility property and found out that the fence <br />is over Lot #14 and Lot #2 and then checked further on the <br />boundaries of Lot #1. Mr. Coker claims that the fence is halfway <br />into his property and that his property has 88 feet frontage on <br />7th Avenue, SW. Mr. Coker claims he owns 50% inside the fenced <br />area, so he and his partners were forced to maintain someone <br />else's property all the while believing it was their property. <br />Therefore, the agreement they have with the County Attorney to <br />maintain the fence is not legal. The bottom line is that they <br />have approximately $11,000 into this property, which is worth <br />approximately $8,000. However, they have taken losses before and <br />they would like to solve this problem by selling it back to the <br />County for $4,000 and take a $7,000 loss. The County could turn <br />it into a neighborhood park where the children have a safe place <br />to play. He would be willing to contribute a basketball <br />backbboard and maybe a dozen basketballs. <br />Returning to the costs incurred in clearing the lot, Mr. <br />Levy pointed out that someone in the County doesn't know how to <br />add because he was sent a packet of invoices which don't total <br />correctly. The total for the Landfill was shown as $1,409.87, <br />but when he added these same invoices, he came up with $1,077.94. <br />They are off $321.93 unless they didn't include all of the <br />invoices in the packet. Mr. Levy felt that someone should have <br />double checked their figures before they sent out the packet. He <br />wished to point out that the permit numbers are for different <br />jobs, and when he called and asked what a permit number was, the <br />girl told him the permit number is for different jobs. If that <br />is the case, he is being billed for 4 separate jobs, and he <br />didn't feel that was fair. He also asked for an explanation of <br />"carrier and load", and they said they would give him that <br />22 <br />