Laserfiche WebLink
MAR 2 � 1990 <br />BOOK �6 <br />1 <br />642 <br />not have the appeal but for the actions of the property owners. <br />It was not something that was necessary, nor was it something <br />that we engaged in. <br />Commissioner Bird thanked Attorney Sechen for a very <br />thorough review of the appeal process on the D.E.R. permit. <br />SURVEYING SERVICES FOR EASEMENTS - INSTALLATION OF A SEWER <br />COLLECTION SYSTEM ON THE WEST SIDE OF U.S. #1 BETWEEN 10TH AND <br />4TH STREETS <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/7/90: <br />DATE: <br />TO: <br />THRU: <br />PREPARED <br />AND STAFFED <br />BY: <br />MARCH 7, 1990 <br />JAMES E. CHANDLER <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRAT <br />TERRANCE G. PINT <br />DIRECTOR OF UTIL S RVICES <br />WILLIAM F. McCAI <br />CAPITAL.PROJECTS' <br />DEPARTMENT OF UTI SERVICES <br />SUBJECT: SURVEYING SERVICES FOR EASEMENTS <br />TO INSTALL A SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM <br />ON THE WEST SIDE OF U.S. #1 BETWEEN <br />10TH AND 4TH STREETS. IRC PROJECT <br />NO. US -88 -22 -CCS <br />BACKGROUND <br />In the first week of May 1989, the Board of County Commissioners <br />signed a work authorization with Masteller, Moler and Reed for <br />engineering services on the above -listed job. On January 30, 1990, <br />we held a meeting with the affected property owners along the route <br />of the project. This meeting was held to discuss the owners' <br />willingness to provide necessary easements as the route of the line <br />is very tight. As a result of this meeting, some redesign of the <br />route had to be done. This redesign work has been accomplished, and <br />we are now ready to have easements prepared for this project. <br />ANALYSIS <br />We have negotiated the easement surveys with Masteller, Moler and <br />Reed at $375.00 per easement survey. As soon as easements are <br />acquired from the property owners, we can bid the job. Funds for <br />this job will come from Account No. 472-000-169-067.00. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends that the <br />Board of County Commissioners approve the attached proposal. <br />68 <br />