My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/3/1990
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1990
>
4/3/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:02:44 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 8:57:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/03/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
collection and the separation of service areas. Commissioner <br />Scurlock further recommended that we put our new operation in <br />effect October 1st with our new budget year. <br />Administrator Collins confirmed that staff's goal is October <br />1st. He felt it would be more appropriate to consider regulating <br />commercial at the time the ordinances are brought to the Board. <br />Since we will be dealing with both companies in terms of mandatory <br />collection and delineating specific areas of collection, <br />we feel it would be a more orderly approach to address it all at <br />one time. <br />Commissioner Scurlock wished to return to the $26,000 <br />portion of the $74,000 loss, but Mr. Tatoul didn't agree entirely <br />that there is a $26,000 operating loss caused by their decision <br />to not charge the trailer parks the same as single family res- <br />idential. The reason for that is that trailer parks are very <br />different in demigraphics from single-family homes. In mobile <br />home parks, there are smaller lot lines and more customers per <br />mile. They subscribe 100% for service, which gives them a great <br />operational efficiency, and part of that $26,000 is for that <br />operational efficiency. <br />Commissioner Scurlock emphasized that was the reason he <br />asked if they had any single home developments where they offer <br />the discount, and Attorney Stone stated that the mobile home <br />parks are the only ones. Mobile homes are a lot like mandatory <br />collection -- it is 100% subscribed. There is one bill and one <br />check in payment of the entire amount. <br />Commissioner Scurlock agreed to a certain extent, but the <br />difference he calculated is the difference between $88.27 and <br />$42.67. He was sure there is some difference, but he wasn't sure <br />it is double. <br />Attorney Stone noted that two years ago they reviewed that <br />issue which comes under Section 8 of the contract, and he felt <br />Boor F� J <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.