10/14/2014 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• March 11, 2014 Board of County Commission meeting where the Board of County Commissioners authorized bifurcating non-residential and residential fee changes; and (3) highlighted the April 22, 2014 Board of County Commission meeting where the Board adopted an updated schedule for non-residential fees and accepted the consultant's report/ study that supported the non-residential fees. Director Boling reported that on June 6, 2014, the consultant issued a final report, which includes residential and education impact fees. If there is a consensus after this meeting to move forward with a residential fee update, staff will bring it to the July 15, 2014 Board of County Commission meeting, and if there are other tasks, it would probably be sometime in September. He requested Board input and consensus on implementation issues so staff can move forward. B. Consultant Presentation on Residential Fees (Including School Impact Fees) and Implementation Issues 1:37 Associate Principal Nilgun Kamp gave a presentation on the findings of p.m. the technical study, which focused on residential impact fees, school impact fee calculations, and implementation issues. She clarified the consumption -based methodology, affordable growth strategy, residential land uses maximum calculated fees, and residential land uses affordable growth fees. She also elaborated on staff's recommendation to use the affordable growth strategy with the changes to include the library impact fee suspension, cutting the affordable growth strategy by 50% for public buildings, adopting parks impact fee at 75% of the affordable growth strategy, and adopting full fee for emergency services. She said the two new land uses were: (1) single family less than 1,000 square feet, and (2) high cube automated warehouse. Ms. Kamp also spoke about the educational facilities impact fee, facilities built since 2005, ongoing/future projects, the impact fee methodology, and the educational facilities which included the total school facility cost per student station (about $33,000), credit components, and the net impact cost per student (about $24,114), the student generation rate total (about 0.210), and the calculated school impact fee schedule which results in a fee of $2,387 for multi -family and $6,077 for single family. Ms. Kamp thereafter described the affordable growth scenario which results in an adoption percentage of 28%, and the residential fee comparison where the affordable growth fee would change from the current rate of $1,756 to $1,702 for single-family, from $500 to $668 for Impact Fee Update Study Workshop Page 2 99