My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/17/2013AP (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2013
>
09/17/2013AP (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2019 10:42:27 AM
Creation date
3/23/2016 9:19:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
10/14/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
452
Subject
Impact Fee Update Study
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000L\S00060C.tif
SmeadsoftID
14732
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Indian River County I Impact Fee Update Study <br /> Portability <br /> • Impact fees are attached to the project property and are calculated to mitigate the <br /> land use's proportionate impact on County facilities. Once that land use is <br /> permitted, the County will provide needed facilities as required by its own <br /> ordinances. If a land use is later proposed that has a greater impact on County <br /> facilities than did the previously approved land use, then, of course, impact fees for <br /> the new land use would be limited to an amount that simply reflects the increased <br /> impact. <br /> However, the question frequently arises of whether impact fees should be returned <br /> (in cash or as "portable" credits, for example) if the intensity of a land use is reduced <br /> or terminated in the future. "Portability," some argue, would allow the credit <br /> associated with tearing down a building to be used for another parcel. However, <br /> none of the jurisdictions we work with allow for the portability of impact fees that <br /> we are aware of, due to a number of reasons. <br /> First, local governments plan for capital project funding and provide infrastructure <br /> based on development in an area. As part of that process, impact fee revenues are <br /> programmed and spent for the construction of necessary infrastructure in the same <br /> district as the proposed use. Once the applicant has moved forward with its <br /> development, so too does the County with the development's needed infrastructure <br /> for that property in that area of the County. Once these fees are committed for use <br /> to serve a proposed development, they cannot be "uncommitted," and, of course, <br /> previously-built and contracted infrastructure improvements cannot be "ported" to <br /> new locations or benefit districts. <br /> Second, if the County "refunded" fees to properties that reduce or eliminate their <br /> impacts, those "refunds" (having now been committed to meet the needs of the <br /> initial land use) would necessarily redirect impact fees paid by others or general <br /> fund sources, creating a misallocation of burden between existing development and <br /> new growth. <br /> Third, during the typical construction timeframe, running from building permit <br /> issuance to certificate of occupancy, impact fees paid by a developer will not have <br /> been committed and spent by the County. Therefore, if a proposed land use pays <br /> Tindale-Oliver&Associates, Inc. Indian River County <br /> September 2014 10 Impact Fee Update Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.