My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/18/2014 (7)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
11/18/2014 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2023 12:42:29 PM
Creation date
3/23/2016 8:53:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
11/18/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Book and Page
410
Supplemental fields
FilePath
H:\Indian River\Network Files\SL00000E\S0004AE.tif
SmeadsoftID
14159
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
410
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 1.. <br />Genera! Comments <br />1.1, Background <br />The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) was signed into law on January 1, 1970. NEPA establishes <br />"national environmental policy and goals for the protection, maintenance, and enhancement of the <br />environment and provides a process for implementing these goals within the federal agencies." <br />From the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (U.S. EPA) NEPA website, "Title I of NEPA contains a <br />Declaration of National Environmental Policy which requires the federal government to use all practicable <br />means to create and maintain conditions under which man and nature can exist in productive harmony. <br />Section 102 requires federal agencies to incorporate environmental considerations in their planning and <br />decision-making through a systematic interdisciplinary approach. Specifically, all federal agencies are to <br />prepare detailed statements assessing the environmental impact of and alternatives to major federal <br />actions significantly affecting the environment. These statements are commonly referred to as <br />environmental impact statements (EIS)." <br />On September 19, 2014, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) released the Draft Environmental <br />Impact Statement (DEIS) for the All Aboard Florida (AAF) high-speed rail project's Phase 2 ("Proposed <br />Project"). FRA is serving as the lead Federal Agency for the review of the Proposed Project. An <br />Environmental Assessment (EA), presumably using similar methodology, was completed for the Miami to <br />West Palm Beach segment (Phase 1) of the project in 2012. The FRA issued a Finding of No Significant <br />Impact (FONSI) for Phase 1. A supplemental EA is under review (concurrently with the DEIS) for the revised <br />location of a maintenance facility. The supplemental EA has no bearing on the DEIS review. <br />CDM Smith has conducted a thorough review of the DEIS. It should be noted that CDM Smith's review <br />comments focus solely on the information presented in the DEIS that pertains to the portion of the <br />Proposed Project within Indian River County's boundaries (including impacts on municipalities). <br />1..2 General comments <br />The DEIS limits the review of impacts to those activities being planned within the existing right-of-way <br />(ROW) for the Florida East Coast Railroad (FECR), when in fact, the more significant local impacts would fall <br />outside of the corridor at the individual roadway crossings (traffic control and signalization improvements) <br />and bridge crossings. In general, FECR maintains a 100 foot ROW throughout Indian River County. CDM <br />Smith was notified during the diagnostic field evaluation that intersection improvements would include the <br />addition of 100 foot long traffic separating medians on each side of the crossing to address safety <br />requirements for high speed rail projects. This adds up to 200 feet of additional impacts at each of the <br />intersections where the median installation is feasible for the given crossing geometry (exit gates/4- <br />quadrant gates will be used where medians cannot be accommodated). The addition of these medians, at <br />many of the crossings, will require road widening, filling of stormwater swales/ditches, relocation of <br />overhead and underground utilities and potential traffic impacts from shortened queue in turn lanes. <br />CDM 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.