Laserfiche WebLink
The issue of the reasonableness of the City's retail rates is indeed <br /> one for the courts of Florida. Storey v. Mayo, 217 So. 2d 304, 308 <br /> (Fla. 1968) . Regarding what does or does not constitute "unreasonable" <br /> rates, in Rosalind Holding Co. v. Orlando Utilities Commission, 402 <br /> So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 5t DCA, 1981) , the Fifth DCA articulated the <br /> standard for complaints regarding the alleged unreasonableness of <br /> rates charged by municipal electric utilities, such as the Town's <br /> claims in the current dispute, as follows : <br /> A person seeking to attack in the courts the rates charged <br /> by a utility has the burden of showing that the rates are <br /> outside or beyond the "zone of reasonableness, " as <br /> established by the evidence, and not necessarily by the PSC, <br /> so as to be confiscatory or discriminatory. Absent a <br /> controlling statute, a municipal utility, like any other <br /> utility, is entitled to earn a reasonable rate of return on <br /> its capital and its rates may be set so that it earns a rate <br /> of return on its equity comparable to other similar <br /> businesses . <br /> Id. at 1210-11 . <br /> In Rosalind, the Fifth DCA ultimately affirmed a circuit court's <br /> decision that OUC was entitled to earn a return in the range of 13 .5 <br /> percent to 16 percent; the actual percentage value was disputed by the <br /> parties' expert witnesses, but the court held that even the higher <br /> value did not violate the applicable standard. <br /> As applied to Vero Beach, the City believes that, per the holding <br /> of the Fifth DCA in Rosalind, its rates are reasonable. The City <br /> further believes that its underlying costs - while higher than the <br /> City wishes they were - are reasonable and prudent, as well as based <br /> upon decisions made by previous City Councils that were reasonable and <br /> prudent based on all facts known to the City at the time the decisions <br /> to incur those costs were made. Objectively, as of October 2014, the <br /> City's current rates (using the standard benchmark of the cost for <br /> 1, 000 kilowatt-hours of residential service) are slightly above the <br /> average of Florida's municipal utilities; relative to the rates of <br /> Florida's investor-owned utilities, whose rates are regulated by the <br /> PSC, the City's rates are less than those of Gulf Power Company and <br /> Florida Public Utilities Company, within 1.5 percent of Duke Energy <br /> Florida, and greater than those of FPL and Tampa Electric Company. <br /> Additionally, the City transfers 6 percent of its revenues to the <br /> 2Copies of the Storey v. Mayo and Rosalind Holding Co. decisions are <br /> . � included as Attachment E to this mediation statement. <br /> 9 <br /> aq <br />