Laserfiche WebLink
niscussiome 2008 PPA vs. October 20 Proposal vs r 25 proposal <br /> Attachment A is a table that summarizes the key points of the <br /> City's existing 2008 PPA with OUC as compared to the October 20 <br /> Discussion Points and the November 25 Discussion Points. In <br /> summary, the November 25 Discussion Points address the concerns <br /> mentioned above by: (1) reducing the term of the PPA by 6 years, so <br /> that it would terminate at the end of 2023 instead of 2029; (2) the <br /> unilateral option for OUC to terminate the PPA is deleted; (3) the <br /> %St. Lucie Option" is deleted; and (4) OUC would still be in line to <br /> receive or obtain the City's rights to the FGT gas transportation <br /> contracts, @�t that the City would get the right to recall or <br /> reclaim those contracts if the City were to build new gas-fired <br /> generating capacity at the existing Vero Beach Power Plant site to <br /> serve the City's native load. Not surprisingly, because of the <br /> lesser value to OUC of the revised terms, the Capacity Payments in <br /> the November 25 Discussion Points are higher than those in the <br /> October 20 Discussion Points, but still less than those in the 2008 <br /> OUC-COVE PPA. The other changed terms are the same as in the <br /> October 20 Discussion Points. <br /> Naturally, since the revised, November 25 Capacity Payments are <br /> greater than under the October 20 Discussion Points, the savings to <br /> the City are less. Because the estimated effective date of the <br /> amendments is now assumed to be October 1, 2015, the 2015 savings <br /> are significantly less than under the October 20 proposal, about <br /> $1.3 million in 2015 vs. about $7 million under the previous <br /> proposal. Because of the higher pricing, the savings in 2016-2018 <br /> are also less - e.g., about $5.5 million in 2016-2017 vs. about $7 <br /> million in 2016-2017 under the October 20 proposal. Also, because <br /> the new proposal would terminate the PPA as of 2023, there would be <br /> no known or definite savings from the end of 2023 going forward. In <br /> nominal dollar terms, the total savings of the October 20 proposal <br /> vs. the 2008 PPA would be about $68.7 million (including an <br /> adjustment to reflect the current projected implementation date of <br /> October 1, 2015) , and under the November 25 proposal, the nominal <br /> dollar savings are about $37.8 million (also reflecting the October <br /> 1, 2015 implementation date) . (These savings are summarized in <br /> Attachment D to this memo.) <br /> In practical terms, this would limit the City's ability to <br /> reduce retail electric rates in 2016, 2017, and 2018 to somewhat <br /> less than the reductions that would have been possible with the <br /> October 20 proposed Capacity Payment rates. The termination as of <br /> 2023 would also eliminate any known, definite savings available <br /> through PPA amendments as compared to performing the 2008 PPA <br /> through its current termination date, December 31, 2029. Actual <br /> results may be better or worse than the longer-term option (i.e. , <br /> 3 ° <br /> 33 <br />