Laserfiche WebLink
Page S <br /> 402 So.2d 1209,*; 1981 Fla.App.LEXIS 20623,F,a <br /> [**16] Finally Rosalind argues that litigation costs I should <br /> 28. "A reasonable rate is one that falls within not be taxed against it as the representative of the class <br /> a"zone of reason'...it is a field,and not a math- action because such amount has been included in the <br /> ematical point." Wichita Gas Co. v. Public Serv. rates as an operating expense and therefore has been as- <br /> Comm'A 2 F. Supp. 792, 799 (D.Kan.1933), sessed to the OUC's consumers through regular bilis for <br /> modified,290 U.S 561, 54 S. Ct. 321, 78 L Ed service.We find this argument to be without merit, and <br /> 500 (1934). See also: Banton v Bell Line R consequently affirm the award of costs to the OUC as the <br /> Corp., 268 U.S. 413, 45 S. Ct. 534, 69 L Ed prevailing party." <br /> 1020(1925);64 Am.Jur.2d Public Utilities 9190 <br /> (1972), 30. Rosalind does not dispute the amount of <br /> 29. City of Pompano Beach v. Oltman, 389 costs S 8,624.67. <br /> So.2d 283(Fla.4th DCA 1980). 31. §57.041,171a&d.(1979). <br /> N.COSTS. [**17] AFFIRMED. <br /> ORFINGER, J., and WALKER, GRISSIM H., As- <br /> sociate Judge,concur. <br /> 58� <br />