12/17/2014 (3) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

filed a petition for declaratory statement to the Florida Public Service Commission ("PSC") raising issues similar to those raised in the Town's Complaint. Indian River Shores' Complaint The Town's Complaint raised four counts, summarized here: 1 . For declaratory relief that the City's electric rates "are unreasonable, unjust, and inequitable in violation" of law, and injunctive relief enjoining the City from charging such rates; 2 . For declaratory relief that upon the expiration of the existing franchise agreement between the Town and the City, "the City has no legal authority to provide extra-territorial electric service to customers residing within the corporate limits of the Town, " and that upon "expiration of the Franchise Agreement on November 6, 2016, the Town has a legal right to seek substitute electric service from other providers; " 3 . For declaratory relief that the City is subject to and must comply with the provisions of Section 366. 04 (7) , Florida Statutes, which would require municipalities meeting certain criteria to hold a referendum of their customers regarding the establishment of a utility authority to operate the business of the electric utility; and NOW 4. For declaratory relief that the City's denial of the rights of co-plaintiff Michael Ochsner to vote in the referendum constitutes a Constitutional violation of Mr. Ochsner's rights to due process and equal protection of the law. Indian River County's Petition for Declaratory Statement On July 21, 2014, Indian River County ("County") filed a petition for declaratory statement ("Petition") with the Florida Public Service Commission ("PSC") , in which the County requested 14 separate declarations from the PSC. Generally, the requested statements seek the PSC's declaration that upon expiration of the existing franchise agreement between the County and the City, the City will no longer have the right or authority to provide electric service to customers located in the unincorporated areas of the County outside the City limits . The County's Petition also asked the PSC to declare its status as either a "public utility" or an "electric utility, " defined terms with certain regulatory implications, under the PSC's governing statutes, mentioned the referendum issue raised by the Town, and asked for the PSC's advice regarding potential County liability for the City's contract obligations, continuing PSC jurisdiction, or lack thereof, over what are now the City's electric distribution 2 �l