Laserfiche WebLink
"" (b) Ineligibility: An application, in whole or in part, may be declared ineligible by the <br /> Department or the RTP Advisory Committee pursuant to paragraphs 62S-2.073(2)(a)-(I), <br /> (3)(a)-(b) and (4)(a)-(b), F.A.C. If a portion of the project application is determined to be <br /> ineligible, the applicant will be notified and given 15 working days to revise the ineligible <br /> portion. If the ineligible portion still does not meet the subparagraphs stated herein, the <br /> ineligible portion shall be severed or, if not severable, the application shall be rejected. <br /> (6) Application Evaluation. Each eligible application shall be evaluated on the basis <br /> of the information provided in the application in accordance with this part. Each application <br /> shall be assigned a total point score pursuant to subsection 62S-2.072(7), F.A.C. A <br /> project site or facility would not be considered viable if the project does not receive a <br /> minimum number of 55 points for motorized projects, 55 points for nonmotorized projects, <br /> 61 points for mixed-use projects, and 61 points for education projects, as awarded under <br /> low Section 62S-2.073, F.A.C. An application with fewer than the required minimum points will <br /> not be recommended for funding. <br /> (7) Priority Lists. A total point score shall be assigned to each application upon <br /> evaluation of each project under Section 62S-2.073, F.A.C. The RTP Advisory Committee <br /> shall prepare one priority list for each category. Applications shall be ranked on the priority <br /> list according to assigned point scores. The application with the highest score will receive <br /> the highest rank. The funds used for the project shall reduce that particular category's <br /> allocation accordingly. The remaining applications will be arranged in descending order <br /> according to their assigned point scores. Applications scoring below the minimum, <br /> established pursuant to subsection 62S-2.072(6), F.A.C., shall not be placed on the priority <br /> list. The priority list shall include recommendations for distribution of available program <br /> funds. In the event there are insufficient applications to account for all program funds <br /> 33 <br />