Laserfiche WebLink
Dylan Reingold County Attorney <br />William K. DeBraal, Deputy County Attorney <br />Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorney <br />County Attorney's Matters - B.C.C. 03.18.14 <br />Office of <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY <br />ATTORNEY <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners <br />THROUGH: Dylan Reingold, County Attorney QC) -- <br />FROM: Kate Pingolt Cotner, Assistant County Attorn <br />DATE: March 12, 2014 <br />SUBJECT: Legislative Update Regarding Cost -Sharing Proposals for Juvenile Detention Care <br />Centers <br />BACKGROUND: Section 985.686, Florida Statutes, currently states that the State of Florida (the <br />"State") and all non -fiscally restrained counties that do not provide independent detention care for <br />juveniles or contract with another county to provide such service ("Participating Counties") have a joint <br />obligation to contribute to the financial support of the State's juvenile detention centers. The <br />contributions made by the Participating Counties, however, have historically been skewed in large part <br />due to an obscure calculation that was created by Florida's Department of Juvenile Justice ("DJJ"). In <br />June of 2013, Florida's First District Court of Appeal (the "Court") issued an opinion which found that <br />DJJ had exceeded its rulemaking authority when it promulgated its set of rules to implement Section <br />985.686, Florida Statutes. As a result, the process for calculating the shared costs associated with the <br />State's juvenile detention centers was found to be invalid. <br />In response to the Court's opinion, DJJ formulated a new methodology for calculating the Participating <br />Counties' share of the actual costs associated with the State's juvenile detention care centers. The <br />Governor's office, however, determined that DJJ misinterpreted the Court's opinion and under -charged <br />the Participating Counties for fiscal year 2012-2013. In January of 2014, DJJ reinterpreted the Court's <br />ruling and determined that the State is only responsible for the costs associated with any violation of <br />probation (VOP) days and contempt probation days. The Participating Counties, therefore, are <br />responsible for all of the remaining costs associated with juvenile detention care centers (an estimated <br />57%). This reinterpretation has been incorporated into the Governor's proposed budget for fiscal year <br />2014-2015. <br />Approved for March 18, 2014 BCC Meeting <br />County Attorney's Matters <br />COUNTY ATTORNEY <br />Indian River Co. <br />Approved <br />Date <br />Admin. <br />e <br />3//a <br />1 <br />Co. Atty. <br />1,t <br />.. <br />3 J <br />Budget <br />; <br />'► , <br />t <br />i,? <br />Department <br />Risk Management <br />--- <br />169 <br />